Articles
2016 Annual BAA Marketing Law Conference Recap
We attended the BAA’s 2016 38th Annual Marketing Law Conference which wrapped up last week on Friday, Nov 11th. The organization (Brand Activation Association) had another great year in attendance with over 750 professionals ranging from leading regulators, legislators, corporate counsel, marketers and technology innovators who gathered again at the Marriott Hotel on Michigan Ave. This year’s conference was entitled “FACE-OFF: Dynamic Technologies Vs. Regulatory Controls.
“Ours is an industry of rapid evolution” stated Ed Kabak, SVP, ANA and Chief Legal Officer, BAA who kicked off the first official day of the conference. “Since we deal with best practices and the state of the art in Marketing and Advertising Law and Digital Media; IP and Privacy, FTC, State A.G. and state-regulation, Lanham Act, Class Actions, and other areas, this forum is invaluable for marketers to move responsibly forward.”
The conference started off with a day of pre-conference sessions dedicated to basics as well as advanced subjects. I arrived in Chicago that day in time to attend the “Advanced Social Media Sweepstakes/Skill Contests/The Major Platforms and Pitfalls session. This included a nice review of the major platform promotional guidelines including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest and Snapchat. One case study reviewed was the “Drive a Tank” Sweepstakes where a gaming sponsor awarded a grand prize that allowed the winner to actually drive a tank on top of two cars. There were 1.8 million entries from 40,000 entrants who were awarded extra entries from sharing on Facebook and Twitter. There were several issues, such as they didn’t disclose with a proper hashtag to comply with the FTC’s endorsement guidelines and they had to take out additional liability insurance to allow for someone to actually drive this tank.
As has been the case in past years, once the conference officially opened we heard from Linda Goldstein, a Partner and Head of the Advertising, Marketing and Media practice at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP in New York who delivered her annual industry review. Linda reviewed some of the most newsworthy developments of the year and what they mean for marketing and advertising lawyers and professionals. Linda’s talk is always very informative and entertaining as she reviewed again the basics of sweepstakes and skill contests along with social and digital media legal issues from some of the latest promotions.

As far as consideration in mobile promotions, data charges may apply if having to use only a mobile app. Text messages should still have an AMOE and you should disclose that text messaging charges may apply. However, if downloading a free app, there is no consideration, however if the app is a free trial and the participate has to actually cancel to avoid future charges that could be troubling.
Linda entertained us throughout her talk with videos of a new, imaginary app her team created called PizzaMon Go! It included real robots who would come to you and make you a artisan, personal pizza with your choice of toppings. Several issues arose as these young entrepreneurs launched this new technology including privacy issues, in-app purchase requirements, weather related issues that impacted events, and more. In the end, one of the robots was designated as our next Supreme Court Justice.
On Friday morning we were treated to another highly entertaining presentation from Ron Urbach, Chairman/Davis & Gilbert LLP, who also demonstrated how important it is for those in our industry to keep current. His presentation was on the interplay of marketing and advertising law to activate brands. Ron stated that every day attorneys make risk decisions when advising clients so it would probably be helpful for them to know what is on the regulators’ minds. We get asked the question quite often, what are the risks involved? Ron reminded us that Attorney Generals are political animals who will track publicity; that the “reasonable person” standard invoked by the FTC may not be what is considered reasonable at the state level; and that consumer complaints can drive AG actions.
Some recent examples Ron gave was that the FTC charged Lord & Taylor that it deceived consumers through paid articles and paid Instagram posts from the online publication Nylon that came from 50 “Fashion Influencers” promoting a certain dress. Warner Brothers Home Entertainment paid certain gaming influencers, such as PewDiePie, to post positive comments about the Shadow of Modor Game. The Kardashians have been charged that they did not disclose their relationship to the brands that they hype of Instagram.

